Comparison: Body-Worn Camera v. The Human Eye

The difference is between the the human eye (the larger 50 mm photo) and the Axon 4 camera is striking.  These pictures are taken from the exact same spot.

Summary: Understanding Video Evidence Distortion in Police Use-of-Force Incidents

At Critical Incident Review (CIR), we analyze video evidence from police use-of-force incidents, focusing on how camera lenses affect perception. Our recent project compared a 50mm lens, which mimics the human eye’s perspective, with the fisheye lens of an Axon 4 body-worn camera (BWC). The findings highlight significant distortions in distance, time, speed, and motion caused by the BWC’s wide-angle fisheye lens.

 Key Points

  1. Distance Distortion: The fisheye lens makes objects and people appear farther away than they are, potentially misrepresenting how close a threat was to an officer. For example, tests showed an officer at 12 feet from the camera appeared much farther in BWC footage compared to the 50mm lens.
  2. Impact on Perception: This distortion can alter how reviewers perceive an incident, affecting judgments about threat levels, reaction times, and spatial relationships.
  3. Human Eye vs. Camera: A 50mm lens closely matches the human eye’s 40-45 degree field of view and natural perspective, while fisheye lenses exaggerate curvature and stretch objects at the frame’s edges.
  4. Testing Setup: We placed cones at distances from 7 to 45 feet and recorded an individual holding objects (e.g., a knife, spatula, or remote) to demonstrate how lens distortion affects visuals. Both shoulder- and chest-mounted BWCs were tested.
  5. Implications for Law Enforcement:

   – Training: Officers and analysts need education on lens limitations to interpret footage accurately.

   – Scene Documentation: Understanding lens distortion ensures more reliable evidence for investigations and legal proceedings.

   – Best Practices: Comparing lenses helps set standards for accurate visual documentation.

 Why It Matters

The human eye, paired with the brain’s interpretive processes, perceives scenes differently than a camera. BWCs capture a wide field but distort reality, which can mislead viewers about critical incident details. By comparing a 50mm lens to a BWC, CIR aims to improve how footage is analyzed, enhance officer training, and ensure fairer outcomes in use-of-force reviews.

For a full copy of this report,  fill out the form below.

For more on our methods and training, visit [CriticalIncidentReview.com](https://www.criticalincidentreview.com).

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your report is 1 minute away! Make sure to check your email (including spam).

Free Report: Body Worn Cameras v The Human Eye

Share the Post:

Related Posts